Are you getting VFM (value for money)? Under the latest news regarding Virgin Media removing some Tv channels from their line up, due to the increase that
Sky wanted to charge Virgin Media – are you receiving the best services for money?
Let’s start with
Sky’s Package – they offer broadband, low cost telephone charges and TV, but so do Virgin Media (but with less TV channels). One big difference is with
Sky’s phone service you still need to pay line rental to BT, so an extra bill.
Virgin Media on the other hand charge more for their TV package, even though they broadcast fewer channels. With their phone service you can have unlimited calls and this is all billed to you from one company.
Now Virgin Media is offering 20Mb broadband as from May (subject to maybe a new cable modem that costs £25.00, if your current modem is not compatible), along with a 768k upload. This will then become the UK’s fastest internet broadband provider, but they are also increasing the price of this package by £2.00 per month.
If you actually calculate the prices between these rival companies you are better off with some services from one company and vice-versa. Virgin Media cannot beat
Sky’s TV packages, yet Virgin Media offers better pricing on their telephone service and broadband. So, taking all this into consideration, you’re better off by using
Sky for their TV service and Virgin Media for phone and broadband services.
Whats your opinion on this?